Topzle Topzle

Scandinavian migration to the Hawaiian Kingdom

Updated: 12/11/2025, 5:41:05 PM Wikipedia source

Scandinavian migration to the Hawaiian Kingdom occurred in the late 19th century when poor economic conditions in Northern Europe led to successive waves of Nordic immigration to North America. Hundreds of thousands of people left their home countries for better opportunities in the United States. At the same time, in 1875, the governments of the United States and the Kingdom of Hawai'i negotiated and ratified a reciprocity treaty, leading to major investment in the sugar plantations in Hawaii, which required an increase in the labor supply to grow. Planters continued bringing in large numbers of foreign laborers from Asian countries, but now also began to bring in smaller numbers of workers from Europe. In 1880, acting on behalf of the Kingdom and the planters, Christian L'Orange recruited workers in Drammen, Norway. Newspaper ads promised three-year contracts on sugar plantations for those willing to make the journey. More than 600 signed up for the trip to Hawaii, including single men and entire families with children. The group traveled on board two main ships, with a third ship carrying a smaller number of the group along with mostly German passengers. The ships—the Beta, the Musca, and the Cedar—encountered a rough and dangerous voyage lasting four to six months. Some passengers and crew died during the voyage, mostly children, due to malnourishment along the way. Upon arrival in Hawaii, which was then known as the Sandwich Islands in Europe, the authorities determined that some of the migrants were suffering from starvation. After an initially difficult voyage, things did not seem to improve for many of them after landfall on Maui and the island of Hawai'i, although some fared better on O'ahu and elsewhere. Some of the migrants believed they were treated unfairly and that their original contract had been changed. Multiple investigations into their alleged mistreatment were made by local authorities, but it was not until the San Francisco Chronicle published their stories of slave-like conditions to the wider world, that an international investigation occurred. The Scandinavian immigrants participated in three of the most significant labor strikes on sugar plantations in Hawaii before annexation, with most, but not all, leaving the islands for California or returning to Europe.

Tables

Contract Labor Immigrants to Hawai'i, 1852–1905[56]
Japan
Japan
Place of origin
Japan
Number
140,457
China
China
Place of origin
China
Number
45,064
Portugal
Portugal
Place of origin
Portugal
Number
14,670
Korea
Korea
Place of origin
Korea
Number
6,925
Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico
Place of origin
Puerto Rico
Number
5,200
South Sea Islanders
South Sea Islanders
Place of origin
South Sea Islanders
Number
2,450
Spain
Spain
Place of origin
Spain
Number
2,299
Germany
Germany
Place of origin
Germany
Number
1,279
Norway
Norway
Place of origin
Norway
Number
615
Austria
Austria
Place of origin
Austria
Number
372
United States (Black Americans)
United States (Black Americans)
Place of origin
United States (Black Americans)
Number
200
Russia
Russia
Place of origin
Russia
Number
110
United States (White Americans)
United States (White Americans)
Place of origin
United States (White Americans)
Number
100
Italy
Italy
Place of origin
Italy
Number
84
Place of origin
Number
Japan
140,457
China
45,064
Portugal
14,670
Korea
6,925
Puerto Rico
5,200
South Sea Islanders
2,450
Spain
2,299
Germany
1,279
Norway
615
Austria
372
United States (Black Americans)
200
Russia
110
United States (White Americans)
100
Italy
84
Hawai'i Sugar Plantation Labor Strikes, Before 1898[57]
1841
1841
Year
1841
Plantation
Ladd & Company, Kōloa
Island
Kauaʻi
Ethnic group
Native Hawaiian
Issue
Wages
Outcome
No compromise, returned to work
1881
1881
Year
1881
Plantation
Alexander & Baldwin
Island
Maui
Ethnic group
Norwegian
Issue
Food quality
Outcome
Jailed, returned to work
1881
1881
Year
1881
Plantation
Bond, Kohala
Island
Hawai'i
Ethnic group
Norwegian
Issue
Food quality
Outcome
Workers won court case, returned to work
1881
1881
Year
1881
Plantation
Hitchcock, Pāpa'ikou
Island
Hawai'i
Ethnic group
Norwegian
Issue
Food quality, labor contract, working conditions
Outcome
Workers lost court case, returned to work
1891
1891
Year
1891
Plantation
Kohala
Island
Hawai'i
Ethnic group
Chinese
Issue
Contract labor dispute
Outcome
Police attacked, jailed 55 workers
1894
1894
Year
1894
Plantation
Kahuku
Island
O'ahu
Ethnic group
Japanese
Issue
Contract labor dispute
Outcome
Workers arrested, fined
Year
Plantation
Island
Ethnic group
Issue
Outcome
1841
Ladd & Company, Kōloa
Kauaʻi
Native Hawaiian
Wages
No compromise, returned to work
1881
Alexander & Baldwin
Maui
Norwegian
Food quality
Jailed, returned to work
1881
Bond, Kohala
Hawai'i
Norwegian
Food quality
Workers won court case, returned to work
1881
Hitchcock, Pāpa'ikou
Hawai'i
Norwegian
Food quality, labor contract, working conditions
Workers lost court case, returned to work
1891
Kohala
Hawai'i
Chinese
Contract labor dispute
Police attacked, jailed 55 workers
1894
Kahuku
O'ahu
Japanese
Contract labor dispute
Workers arrested, fined

References

  1. Carol A. MacLennan: "Cane sugar production was probably the first true industry of the modern era, due to the biochemica
  2. Carol A. MacLennan: "Estimated human population at the time of Cook's arrival varies—ranging from 279,000 by demographer
  3. See the table Hawai'i Sugar Plantation Labor Strikes, Before 1898.
  4. See the table Contract Labor Immigrants to Hawai'i, 1852–1905.
  5. The timeline of the Scandinavian migration to the Kingdom of Hawai'i was quickly followed by radical changes in the regi
  6. Knut Vollebæk, former Norwegian ambassador to the United States (2001–2007): "More than 800,000 Norwegians left Norway d
  7. L'Orange's original ad: "To the Emigrants for the Sandwich Islands" "Contracts with those who will go to the Sandwich I
  8. Kuykendall corrects the arrival date from May 14 to May 13, finding that the May 14 date was likely erroneously duplicat
  9. Grip's original report was titled Der Verhältnisse I der I Schwedischen und Norwegischen Arbeiter I auf den I Hawaiische
  10. A small number of Norwegians played a role in early California history, particularly in the California gold rush (1848–1
  11. Kuykendell believes the commonly cited number of 615 (which represents only the number of Scandinavian contract laborers
  12. MacLennan 2014, p. 9.
  13. Coman 1903, pp. 5–8.
  14. MacLennan 2014, p. 22.
  15. MacLennan 2014, p. 22; Coman 1903, pp. 6-11.
  16. Valentine 2014, p. 98.
  17. Davis 1962, pp. 3–4.
  18. Hawai'i State Archives 2025.
  19. Davis 1962, pp. 2–3; Menton 1989, p. 34-35.
  20. Beechert 1985, pp. 85-87.
  21. Williams 1919, p. 576.
  22. Menton 1989, p. 34-35; Jones & Osgood 2015, pp. 37-40.
  23. Bowman 1980.
  24. Greipsland 2004, pp. 9, 103.
  25. Davis 1963, p. 28.
  26. Takaki 1985, pp. 32-42.
  27. Satrum 2011, p. 8.
  28. Rio 2015, p. 253.
  29. Davis 1962, p. 1.
  30. Davis 1963, p. 29.
  31. Barton 1982, p. 68.
  32. Satrum 2011, pp. 9-10; Bark Cedar. Bremen, Germany to Honolulu, Hawaii 18 June 1881. Immigrant Ships Transcribers Guild
    https://www.immigrantships.net/v4/1800v4/cedar18810618.html
  33. Joesting 1984, pp. 223-227.
  34. Satrum 2011, p. 11.
  35. Davis 1962, pp. 8-9.
  36. San Francisco Chronicle 1881, "The Beta, Sandwich Islands", p. 3.
  37. Davis 1962, p. 11.
  38. Greipsland 2004 pp. 24-26.
  39. Kuykendell 1967, p. 673, note 66.
  40. Merry 2000, p. 215; Bark Musca. Drammen, Norway to Honolulu, Hawaii 14 May 1881. Immigrant Ships Transcribers Guild (IST
    https://www.immigrantships.net/v4/1800v4/musca18810514.html
  41. Joesting 1984, pp. 179, 224-229.
  42. Letter of Martin Blackstad. To his grand daughters, Anna Jean Blackstad and Marian Blackstad in 1931.
    https://www.next1000.com/family/GRUBB/kauai.blackstad.html
  43. Davis 1963, p. 30.
  44. Takaki 1985, p. 146.
  45. Greipsland 2004, pp. 28-29.
  46. Merry 2000, p. 215.
  47. Davis 1978, pp. 226-228.
  48. Beechert 1993, p. 50; Coman 1903, pp. 34.
  49. San Francisco Chronicle 1882, "Confirming the Charge". p. 2.
  50. San Francisco Chronicle 1882, "The Hawaiian Hades". p. 1.
  51. Forbes 2003, pp. 73-74; Grip 1884, pp. 41-51.
  52. Kuykendall 1967, p. 673, note 67.
  53. Grip 1884, p. 42.
  54. Nordyke 1989, p. 47.
  55. Thrum 1909, p. 19.
  56. Norlie 1925, pp. 177-178, 235-236.
  57. Bjork 1958, pp. 629-630.
  58. Beechert 1985, pp. 80–81.
  59. Kvistad 2006.
  60. Hale 1986, p. 135.
  61. Davis 1962, pp. 1–39; Davis 1963, pp. 28–35.
  62. Ekstrand 1980, p. 142; Clairmont 1980.
  63. Wilson 2006.
  64. Hale 1986, p. x.
  65. Rio 2015, p. 264.
  66. Kjerland 2015, p. xvii.
  67. Ivers 1909, as cited in Nordyke 1989, p. 249.
  68. Takaki 1983, as cited in Jones & Osgood 2015, p. 45; Greipsland 2004, pp. 27-31.
Image
Source:
Tip: Wheel or +/− to zoom, drag to pan, Esc to close.