Topzle Topzle

Party-list representation in the House of Representatives of the Philippines

Updated: 12/20/2025, 1:05:37 PM Wikipedia source

While most seats in the House of Representatives of the Philippines are elected by plurality vote in single-member districts, 20% of representatives are elected by party-list proportional representation. The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines created the party-list system. Originally, the party-list was open to underrepresented community sectors or groups, including labor, peasant, urban poor, indigenous cultural, women, youth, and other such sectors as may be defined by law (except the religious sector). However, a 2013 Supreme Court decision clarified that the party-list is a system of proportional representation open to various kinds of groups and parties, and not an exercise exclusive to marginalized sectors. National parties or organizations and regional parties or organizations do not need to organize along sectoral lines and do not need to represent any marginalized and underrepresented sector. The determination of what parties are allowed to participate—who their nominees should be, how the winners should be determined, and the allocation of seats for the winning parties—has been controversial ever since the party-list election was first contested in 1998 and has resulted in several landmark COMELEC and Supreme Court cases. Party-list representatives are indirectly elected via a party-list election wherein the voter votes for the party and not for the party's nominees (closed list); the votes are then arranged in descending order, with the parties that won at least 2% of the national vote given one seat, with additional seats determined by a formula dependent on the number of votes garnered by the party. No party wins more than three seats. If the number of sectoral representatives does not reach 20% of the total number of representatives in the House, parties that haven't won seats but garnered enough votes to place them among the top sectoral parties are given a seat each until the 63 seats are filled. A voter therefore has two parallel votes in House of Representatives elections—for district representative and for the under-represented sectoral-party list representative/s. Neither vote affects the other. Party-list representation makes use of the tendency for proportional representation systems to favor single-issue parties, and applies that tendency to allow underrepresented sectors to represent themselves in the law-making process.

Tables

· Manner of election › Party-List System Act
20% quota
20% quota
Election
20% quota
Method
Seats won
1998
1998
Election
1998
Method
R.A.7941
Legislative districts
206
Sectoral representatives
52
Sectoral representatives
14
Underhang
38
2001
2001
Election
2001
Method
VFP
Legislative districts
205
Sectoral representatives
51
Sectoral representatives
14
Underhang
37
2004
2004
Election
2004
Method
VFP
Legislative districts
209
Sectoral representatives
52
Sectoral representatives
24
Underhang
28
2007
2007
Election
2007
Method
VFP
Legislative districts
218
Sectoral representatives
54
Sectoral representatives
22
Underhang
32
BANAT
BANAT
Election
BANAT
Method
53
Legislative districts
1
2010
2010
Election
2010
Method
BANAT
Legislative districts
229
Sectoral representatives
57
Sectoral representatives
56
Underhang
1
Election
Method
Legislative districts
Sectoral representatives
Underhang
20% quota
Seats won
1998
R.A.7941
206
52
14
38
2001
VFP
205
51
14
37
2004
VFP
209
52
24
28
2007
VFP
218
54
22
32
BANAT
53
1
2010
BANAT
229
57
56
1
Party-list results · Manner of election › Contestations › <i>Veterans Federation Party et al. vs. COMELEC</i>
Note: Majority of the parties were disqualified after the election.
Note: Majority of the parties were disqualified after the election.
2001:
Note: Majority of the parties were disqualified after the election.
2004:
2004:
2001:
2004:
2007:
2007:
2001:
2007:
2010:
2010:
2001:
2010:
Key:
Key:
2001:
Key:
Inner ring: Proportion of votes, excluding spoiled/invalid votes. Gray: Parties that did not win seats. Middle ring (2007 only): Proportion of seats won as per VFP vs. COMELEC. Outer ring: Proportion of seats won (for 2007, this is the final allocation as per BANAT vs. COMELEC). Black: Unfilled seats.
Inner ring: Proportion of votes, excluding spoiled/invalid votes. Gray: Parties that did not win seats. Middle ring (2007 only): Proportion of seats won as per VFP vs. COMELEC. Outer ring: Proportion of seats won (for 2007, this is the final allocation as per BANAT vs. COMELEC). Black: Unfilled seats.
2001:
Inner ring: Proportion of votes, excluding spoiled/invalid votes. Gray: Parties that did not win seats. Middle ring (2007 only): Proportion of seats won as per VFP vs. COMELEC. Outer ring: Proportion of seats won (for 2007, this is the final allocation as per BANAT vs. COMELEC). Black: Unfilled seats.
2001:
Note: Majority of the parties were disqualified after the election.
2004:
2007:
2010:
Key:
Inner ring: Proportion of votes, excluding spoiled/invalid votes. Gray: Parties that did not win seats. Middle ring (2007 only): Proportion of seats won as per VFP vs. COMELEC. Outer ring: Proportion of seats won (for 2007, this is the final allocation as per BANAT vs. COMELEC). Black: Unfilled seats.
· Manner of election › Contestations › Summary
R.A. 7941
R.A. 7941
Method
R.A. 7941
First seat
2% of vote
Second seat
4% of vote
Third seat
6% of vote
VFP vs. COMELEC
VFP vs. COMELEC
Method
VFP vs. COMELEC
First seat
2% of the vote
Second seat
Party with most votes: 4% of the vote
Third seat
Party with most votes: 6% of the vote
Other parties: Total votes divided by votes of the party with most votes; quotient will be multiplied by the number of seats the party with the most votes have. Product, disregarding decimals, is the number of seats.
Other parties: Total votes divided by votes of the party with most votes; quotient will be multiplied by the number of seats the party with the most votes have. Product, disregarding decimals, is the number of seats.
Method
Other parties: Total votes divided by votes of the party with most votes; quotient will be multiplied by the number of seats the party with the most votes have. Product, disregarding decimals, is the number of seats.
BANAT vs. COMELEC
BANAT vs. COMELEC
Method
BANAT vs. COMELEC
First seat
2% of the vote
Second seat
Hare quota, without decimals, from the seats that are not yet allocated.
If quota has not been met, parties with less than 2% of the preferences will get one seat until quota is met.
If quota has not been met, parties with less than 2% of the preferences will get one seat until quota is met.
Method
If quota has not been met, parties with less than 2% of the preferences will get one seat until quota is met.
Method
First seat
Second seat
Third seat
R.A. 7941
2% of vote
4% of vote
6% of vote
VFP vs. COMELEC
2% of the vote
Party with most votes: 4% of the vote
Party with most votes: 6% of the vote
Other parties: Total votes divided by votes of the party with most votes; quotient will be multiplied by the number of seats the party with the most votes have. Product, disregarding decimals, is the number of seats.
BANAT vs. COMELEC
2% of the vote
Hare quota, without decimals, from the seats that are not yet allocated.
If quota has not been met, parties with less than 2% of the preferences will get one seat until quota is met.
· Results
Up
Up
Year
Up
Seats
Underhang
Seats
Participants
Parties
Winners
Parties
% losing parties' vote
Parties
Party
Topnotcher
Votes
Topnotcher
% of valid votes
Topnotcher
Seatswon
Topnotcher
Valid votes
Turnout
% of total
Turnout
Total
Turnout
% of voters
1998
1998
Year
1998
Seats
51
Seats
37
Parties
123
Parties
14
Parties
63%
Topnotcher
APEC
Topnotcher
503,487
Topnotcher
5.50%
Topnotcher
2
Turnout
9,155,309
Turnout
31.26%
Turnout
29,285,775
Turnout
69%
2001
2001
Year
2001
Seats
51
Seats
37
Parties
162
Parties
14
Parties
36%
Topnotcher
Bayan Muna
Topnotcher
1,708,253
Topnotcher
11.30%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
15,118,815
Turnout
51.29%
Turnout
29,474,309
Turnout
51%
2004
2004
Year
2004
Seats
52
Seats
24
Parties
66
Parties
28
Parties
35%
Topnotcher
Bayan Muna
Topnotcher
1,203,305
Topnotcher
9.46%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
13,241,974
Turnout
39.52%
Turnout
33,510,092
Turnout
40%
2007
2007
Year
2007
Seats
54
Seats
1
Parties
93
Parties
53
Parties
33%
Topnotcher
Buhay
Topnotcher
1,169,338
Topnotcher
7.30%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
15,950,900
Turnout
48.63%
Turnout
32,800,054
Turnout
49%
2010
2010
Year
2010
Seats
57
Seats
0
Parties
178
Parties
57
Parties
30%
Topnotcher
Ako Bikol
Topnotcher
1,524,006
Topnotcher
5.20%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
30,092,613
Turnout
78.88%
Turnout
38,149,371
Turnout
74%
2013
2013
Year
2013
Seats
58
Seats
2
Parties
112
Parties
56
Parties
25%
Topnotcher
Buhay
Topnotcher
1,270,608
Topnotcher
4.60%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
28,600,124
Turnout
71.24%
Turnout
40,144,207
Turnout
76%
2016
2016
Year
2016
Seats
59
Seats
0
Parties
115
Parties
59
Parties
22%
Topnotcher
Ako Bikol
Topnotcher
1,664,975
Topnotcher
5.14%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
32,377,841
Turnout
71.98%
Turnout
44,980,362
Turnout
81%
2019
2019
Year
2019
Seats
61
Seats
0
Parties
134
Parties
61
Parties
23%
Topnotcher
ACT-CIS
Topnotcher
2,651,987
Topnotcher
9.51%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
27,884,790
Turnout
58.96%
Turnout
47,296,442
Turnout
74%
2022
2022
Year
2022
Seats
63
Seats
0
Parties
177
Parties
55
Parties
29.57%
Topnotcher
ACT-CIS
Topnotcher
2,111,091
Topnotcher
5.74%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
36,802,064
Turnout
65.61%
Turnout
56,095,234
Turnout
83%
2025
2025
Year
2025
Seats
63
Seats
0
Parties
162
Parties
52
Parties
27.39%
Topnotcher
Akbayan
Topnotcher
2,779,621
Topnotcher
6.63%
Topnotcher
3
Turnout
41,950,339
Turnout
73.15%
Turnout
57,350,958
Turnout
82%
Year
Seats
Parties
Topnotcher
Turnout
Up
Underhang
Participants
Winners
% losing parties' vote
Party
Votes
% of valid votes
Seatswon
Valid votes
% of total
Total
% of voters
1998
51
37
123
14
63%
APEC
503,487
5.50%
2
9,155,309
31.26%
29,285,775
69%
2001
51
37
162
14
36%
Bayan Muna
1,708,253
11.30%
3
15,118,815
51.29%
29,474,309
51%
2004
52
24
66
28
35%
Bayan Muna
1,203,305
9.46%
3
13,241,974
39.52%
33,510,092
40%
2007
54
1
93
53
33%
Buhay
1,169,338
7.30%
3
15,950,900
48.63%
32,800,054
49%
2010
57
0
178
57
30%
Ako Bikol
1,524,006
5.20%
3
30,092,613
78.88%
38,149,371
74%
2013
58
2
112
56
25%
Buhay
1,270,608
4.60%
3
28,600,124
71.24%
40,144,207
76%
2016
59
0
115
59
22%
Ako Bikol
1,664,975
5.14%
3
32,377,841
71.98%
44,980,362
81%
2019
61
0
134
61
23%
ACT-CIS
2,651,987
9.51%
3
27,884,790
58.96%
47,296,442
74%
2022
63
0
177
55
29.57%
ACT-CIS
2,111,091
5.74%
3
36,802,064
65.61%
56,095,234
83%
2025
63
0
162
52
27.39%
Akbayan
2,779,621
6.63%
3
41,950,339
73.15%
57,350,958
82%

References

  1. "SC shakes up party list in new verdict"
    https://www.rappler.com/nation/25502-sc-partylist-system-is-not-solely-for-marginalized
  2. "CONSTITUTION – Article VI: LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT"
    https://web.archive.org/web/20100623005008/http://www.comelec.gov.ph/laws/constitution/consti_art6.html
  3. "REPUBLIC ACT No. 7941 AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE ELECTION OF PARTY-LIST REPRESENTATIVES THROUGH THE PARTY-LIST SYSTEM, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR"
    https://web.archive.org/web/20100617195541/http://www.comelec.gov.ph/laws/republic_acts/ra_7941.html
  4. Manila Bulletin
    http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/286667/should-we-retain-partylist-system
  5. The Manila Times
    https://web.archive.org/web/20110811183210/http://archives.manilatimes.net/national/2009/may/02/yehey/opinion/20090502opi2.html
  6. Philippine Daily Inquirer
    https://archive.today/20120713174615/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20070702-74414/Dilemma_over_partylist_formula_delays_winners%92_proclamation
  7. Supreme Court of the Philippines
    https://web.archive.org/web/20120401210554/http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/oct2000/136781.htm
  8. Philippine Daily Inquirer
    https://web.archive.org/web/20121009170927/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20070605-69478/Only_Buhay_may_get_three_seats__
  9. Philippine Daily Inquirer
    https://web.archive.org/web/20121009171044/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090423-200890/Mechanism-of-proportional-representation
  10. GMA News
    http://www.gmanews.tv/story/206434/ex-sc-chief-sees-urgent-need-to-amend-partylist-law
  11. Philippine Daily Inquirer
    https://web.archive.org/web/20090427180107/http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20090425-201449/Party-list-imponderables
  12. Manila Bulletin
    http://www.mb.com.ph/node/204097
  13. GMA News
    http://www.gmanews.tv/story/187170/arroyo-to-use-party-list-seats-to-win-as-house-speaker
  14. GMANews.tv
    http://www.gmanews.tv/story/214076/sc-its-final-mikey-can-represent-security-guards-tricycle-drivers-in-congress
  15. GMANews.tv
    http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182530/disqualification-of-leftist-party-list-groups-eyed
  16. Philippine Daily Inquirer
    https://web.archive.org/web/20121028082757/https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/296296/akbayan-hits-back-seeks-ouster-of-red-party-listers
  17. Philippine News Agency
    https://web.archive.org/web/20190323042703/http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1065223
  18. Manila Bulletin
    https://web.archive.org/web/20210108084330/https://mb.com.ph/2021/01/07/abolish-party-list-system-duterte-urges-congress/
  19. Philippine Daily Inquirer
    https://web.archive.org/web/20120326173830/http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20070506-64338/Another_slap_on_the_Comelec
  20. Supreme Court of the Philippines
    https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/179271.htm
  21. INQUIRER.net
    https://opinion.inquirer.net/117230/party-list-an-experiment-gone-berserk
Image
Source:
Tip: Wheel or +/− to zoom, drag to pan, Esc to close.