Party-list representation in the House of Representatives of the Philippines
Updated: 12/20/2025, 1:05:37 PM Wikipedia source
While most seats in the House of Representatives of the Philippines are elected by plurality vote in single-member districts, 20% of representatives are elected by party-list proportional representation. The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines created the party-list system. Originally, the party-list was open to underrepresented community sectors or groups, including labor, peasant, urban poor, indigenous cultural, women, youth, and other such sectors as may be defined by law (except the religious sector). However, a 2013 Supreme Court decision clarified that the party-list is a system of proportional representation open to various kinds of groups and parties, and not an exercise exclusive to marginalized sectors. National parties or organizations and regional parties or organizations do not need to organize along sectoral lines and do not need to represent any marginalized and underrepresented sector. The determination of what parties are allowed to participate—who their nominees should be, how the winners should be determined, and the allocation of seats for the winning parties—has been controversial ever since the party-list election was first contested in 1998 and has resulted in several landmark COMELEC and Supreme Court cases. Party-list representatives are indirectly elected via a party-list election wherein the voter votes for the party and not for the party's nominees (closed list); the votes are then arranged in descending order, with the parties that won at least 2% of the national vote given one seat, with additional seats determined by a formula dependent on the number of votes garnered by the party. No party wins more than three seats. If the number of sectoral representatives does not reach 20% of the total number of representatives in the House, parties that haven't won seats but garnered enough votes to place them among the top sectoral parties are given a seat each until the 63 seats are filled. A voter therefore has two parallel votes in House of Representatives elections—for district representative and for the under-represented sectoral-party list representative/s. Neither vote affects the other. Party-list representation makes use of the tendency for proportional representation systems to favor single-issue parties, and applies that tendency to allow underrepresented sectors to represent themselves in the law-making process.
Tables
| Election | Method | Legislative districts | Sectoral representatives | Underhang | |
| 20% quota | Seats won | ||||
| 1998 | R.A.7941 | 206 | 52 | 14 | 38 |
| 2001 | VFP | 205 | 51 | 14 | 37 |
| 2004 | VFP | 209 | 52 | 24 | 28 |
| 2007 | VFP | 218 | 54 | 22 | 32 |
| BANAT | 53 | 1 | |||
| 2010 | BANAT | 229 | 57 | 56 | 1 |
| 2001: |
| Note: Majority of the parties were disqualified after the election. |
| 2004: |
| |
| 2007: |
| |
| 2010: |
| |
| Key: |
| Inner ring: Proportion of votes, excluding spoiled/invalid votes. Gray: Parties that did not win seats. Middle ring (2007 only): Proportion of seats won as per VFP vs. COMELEC. Outer ring: Proportion of seats won (for 2007, this is the final allocation as per BANAT vs. COMELEC). Black: Unfilled seats. |
| Method | First seat | Second seat | Third seat |
| R.A. 7941 | 2% of vote | 4% of vote | 6% of vote |
| VFP vs. COMELEC | 2% of the vote | Party with most votes: 4% of the vote | Party with most votes: 6% of the vote |
| Other parties: Total votes divided by votes of the party with most votes; quotient will be multiplied by the number of seats the party with the most votes have. Product, disregarding decimals, is the number of seats. | |||
| BANAT vs. COMELEC | 2% of the vote | Hare quota, without decimals, from the seats that are not yet allocated. | |
| If quota has not been met, parties with less than 2% of the preferences will get one seat until quota is met. | |||
| Year | Seats | Parties | Topnotcher | Turnout | |||||||||
| Up | Underhang | Participants | Winners | % losing parties' vote | Party | Votes | % of valid votes | Seatswon | Valid votes | % of total | Total | % of voters | |
| 1998 | 51 | 37 | 123 | 14 | 63% | APEC | 503,487 | 5.50% | 2 | 9,155,309 | 31.26% | 29,285,775 | 69% |
| 2001 | 51 | 37 | 162 | 14 | 36% | Bayan Muna | 1,708,253 | 11.30% | 3 | 15,118,815 | 51.29% | 29,474,309 | 51% |
| 2004 | 52 | 24 | 66 | 28 | 35% | Bayan Muna | 1,203,305 | 9.46% | 3 | 13,241,974 | 39.52% | 33,510,092 | 40% |
| 2007 | 54 | 1 | 93 | 53 | 33% | Buhay | 1,169,338 | 7.30% | 3 | 15,950,900 | 48.63% | 32,800,054 | 49% |
| 2010 | 57 | 0 | 178 | 57 | 30% | Ako Bikol | 1,524,006 | 5.20% | 3 | 30,092,613 | 78.88% | 38,149,371 | 74% |
| 2013 | 58 | 2 | 112 | 56 | 25% | Buhay | 1,270,608 | 4.60% | 3 | 28,600,124 | 71.24% | 40,144,207 | 76% |
| 2016 | 59 | 0 | 115 | 59 | 22% | Ako Bikol | 1,664,975 | 5.14% | 3 | 32,377,841 | 71.98% | 44,980,362 | 81% |
| 2019 | 61 | 0 | 134 | 61 | 23% | ACT-CIS | 2,651,987 | 9.51% | 3 | 27,884,790 | 58.96% | 47,296,442 | 74% |
| 2022 | 63 | 0 | 177 | 55 | 29.57% | ACT-CIS | 2,111,091 | 5.74% | 3 | 36,802,064 | 65.61% | 56,095,234 | 83% |
| 2025 | 63 | 0 | 162 | 52 | 27.39% | Akbayan | 2,779,621 | 6.63% | 3 | 41,950,339 | 73.15% | 57,350,958 | 82% |
References
- "SC shakes up party list in new verdict"https://www.rappler.com/nation/25502-sc-partylist-system-is-not-solely-for-marginalized
- "CONSTITUTION – Article VI: LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT"https://web.archive.org/web/20100623005008/http://www.comelec.gov.ph/laws/constitution/consti_art6.html
- "REPUBLIC ACT No. 7941 AN ACT PROVIDING FOR THE ELECTION OF PARTY-LIST REPRESENTATIVES THROUGH THE PARTY-LIST SYSTEM, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR"https://web.archive.org/web/20100617195541/http://www.comelec.gov.ph/laws/republic_acts/ra_7941.html
- Manila Bulletinhttp://www.mb.com.ph/articles/286667/should-we-retain-partylist-system
- The Manila Timeshttps://web.archive.org/web/20110811183210/http://archives.manilatimes.net/national/2009/may/02/yehey/opinion/20090502opi2.html
- Philippine Daily Inquirerhttps://archive.today/20120713174615/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20070702-74414/Dilemma_over_partylist_formula_delays_winners%92_proclamation
- Supreme Court of the Philippineshttps://web.archive.org/web/20120401210554/http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2000/oct2000/136781.htm
- Philippine Daily Inquirerhttps://web.archive.org/web/20121009170927/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20070605-69478/Only_Buhay_may_get_three_seats__
- Philippine Daily Inquirerhttps://web.archive.org/web/20121009171044/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20090423-200890/Mechanism-of-proportional-representation
- GMA Newshttp://www.gmanews.tv/story/206434/ex-sc-chief-sees-urgent-need-to-amend-partylist-law
- Philippine Daily Inquirerhttps://web.archive.org/web/20090427180107/http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20090425-201449/Party-list-imponderables
- Manila Bulletinhttp://www.mb.com.ph/node/204097
- GMA Newshttp://www.gmanews.tv/story/187170/arroyo-to-use-party-list-seats-to-win-as-house-speaker
- GMANews.tvhttp://www.gmanews.tv/story/214076/sc-its-final-mikey-can-represent-security-guards-tricycle-drivers-in-congress
- GMANews.tvhttp://www.gmanews.tv/story/182530/disqualification-of-leftist-party-list-groups-eyed
- Philippine Daily Inquirerhttps://web.archive.org/web/20121028082757/https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/296296/akbayan-hits-back-seeks-ouster-of-red-party-listers
- Philippine News Agencyhttps://web.archive.org/web/20190323042703/http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1065223
- Manila Bulletinhttps://web.archive.org/web/20210108084330/https://mb.com.ph/2021/01/07/abolish-party-list-system-duterte-urges-congress/
- Philippine Daily Inquirerhttps://web.archive.org/web/20120326173830/http://opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20070506-64338/Another_slap_on_the_Comelec
- Supreme Court of the Philippineshttps://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2009/april2009/179271.htm
- INQUIRER.nethttps://opinion.inquirer.net/117230/party-list-an-experiment-gone-berserk