Topzle Topzle

Myers–Briggs Type Indicator

Updated: Wikipedia source

Myers–Briggs Type Indicator

The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a self-report questionnaire that makes pseudoscientific claims to categorize individuals into 16 distinct "personality types" based on psychology. The test assigns a binary letter value to each of four dichotomous categories: introversion or extraversion, sensing or intuition, thinking or feeling, and judging or perceiving. This produces a four-letter test result such as "INTJ" or "ESFP", representing one of 16 possible types. The MBTI was constructed during World War II by Americans Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers, inspired by Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung's 1921 book Psychological Types. Isabel Myers was particularly fascinated by the concept of "introversion", and she typed herself as an "INFP". However, she felt the book was too complex for the general public, and therefore she tried to organize the Jungian cognitive functions to make it more accessible. The perceived accuracy of test results relies on the Barnum effect, flattery, and confirmation bias, leading participants to personally identify with descriptions that are somewhat desirable, vague, and widely applicable. As a psychometric indicator, the test exhibits significant deficiencies, including poor validity, poor reliability, measuring supposedly dichotomous categories that are not independent, and not being comprehensive. Most of the research supporting the MBTI's validity has been produced by the Center for Applications of Psychological Type, an organization run by the Myers–Briggs Foundation, and published in the center's own journal, the Journal of Psychological Type (JPT), raising questions of independence, bias and conflict of interest. The MBTI is widely-regarded as "totally meaningless" by the scientific community. According to University of Pennsylvania professor Adam Grant, "There is no evidence behind it. The traits measured by the test have almost no predictive power when it comes to how happy you'll be in a given situation, how well you'll perform at your job, or how satisfied you'll be in your marriage." Despite controversies over validity, the instrument has demonstrated widespread influence since its adoption by the Educational Testing Service in 1962. It is estimated that 50 million people have taken the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator and that 10,000 businesses, 2,500 colleges and universities, and 200 government agencies in the United States use the MBTI.

Tables

Carl Jung · Concepts › Four dichotomies
Perception
Perception
Col 1
Perception
Subjective
Intuition/Sensing
Objective
Introversion/Extraversion 1
Judging
Judging
Col 1
Judging
Subjective
Feeling/Thinking
Objective
Introversion/Extraversion 2
Subjective
Objective
Perception
Intuition/Sensing
Introversion/Extraversion 1
Judging
Feeling/Thinking
Introversion/Extraversion 2
Myers–Briggs, 16 Personalities · Concepts › Four dichotomies
Deduction
Deduction
Col 1
Deduction
Col 2
Deduction, Induction
Subjective
Intuition/Sensing
Objective
Introversion/Extraversion
Intuition/Observing
Intuition/Observing
Col 1
Intuition/Observing
Induction
Induction
Col 1
Induction
Col 2
Retroduction
Subjective
Feeling/Thinking
Objective
Perception/Judging
Prospecting/Judging
Prospecting/Judging
Col 1
Prospecting/Judging
Subjective
Objective
Deduction
Deduction, Induction
Intuition/Sensing
Introversion/Extraversion
Intuition/Observing
Induction
Retroduction
Feeling/Thinking
Perception/Judging
Prospecting/Judging

References

  1. "X" stands for dichotomies: in this particular case, what letter goes in which place doesn't matter for the description.
  2. It also correlates −.24 with aggression, but is it doubtful whether this correlation is really unfortunate.
  3. By a rule of thumb, these correlations should be considered weak, weak, weak, moderate, weak, weak and noise respectivel
  4. The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/myers-briggs-psychology-test-garbage-b2200663.html
  5. Journal of Business Research
    https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0148-2963%2885%2990004-9
  6. Stein & Swan 2019.
  7. Thyer & Pignotti 2015.
  8. Lilienfeld, Lynn & Lohr 2014.
  9. Attributed to multiple sources:
  10. Myers & Myers 1995.
  11. The Myers & Briggs Foundation
    https://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/
  12. Review of Educational Research
    https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543063004467
  13. NPR
    https://www.npr.org/2018/09/22/650019038/how-the-myers-briggs-personality-test-began-in-a-mothers-living-room-lab
  14. Whitbourne, Susan Krauss
    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/fulfillment-at-any-age/201401/what-you-dont-know-about-this-personality-test-can-hurt-you
  15. Grant 2013.
  16. Pittenger 1993.
  17. Gardner & Martinko 1996.
  18. Boyle 1995.
  19. The New York Times
    https://archive.nytimes.com/op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/07/18/why-myers-briggs-is-totally-useless-but-wildly-popular/
  20. BBC News
    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-28315137
  21. Vox
    https://www.vox.com/2014/7/15/5881947/myers-briggs-personality-test-meaningless
  22. The Washington Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/myers-briggs-does-it-pay-to-know-your-type/2012/12/14/eaed51ae-3fcc-11e2-bca3-aadc9b7e29c5_story.html
  23. Center for Applications of Psychological Type
    http://www.capt.org/mbti-assessment/isabel-myers.htm
  24. "The TYPE Writer: 'It Happened In 1943: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Turns 60 Years Old'"
    https://www.cpp.com/pr/Fall03TYPEwriter.pdf
  25. Myers & Myers 1995, p. 22.
  26. The New Republic
  27. The New Republic
  28. Myers & Myers 1995, p. xx.
  29. Myers & Myers 1995, p. xiii.
  30. Myers & Myers 1995, pp. xiii, xx.
  31. "Guide to the Isabel Briggs Myers Papers 1885–1992"
    https://findingaids.uflib.ufl.edu/repositories/2/resources/593
  32. Myers & Myers 1995, p. xxi.
  33. Myers et al. 1998.
  34. Johnson & Saunders 1990.
  35. Bess, Harvey & Swartz 2003.
  36. Journal of Psychological Type
    https://www.capt.org/jpt/pdfFiles/JPT_Vol_35.pdf
  37. Journal of Psychological Type
    https://www.capt.org/jpt/pdfFiles/Marioles_N_et_al_Vol_36_16_27.pdf
  38. Language learning motivation: pathways to the new century
    https://books.google.com/books?id=v7Ww2tooAs0C&pg=PA88
  39. The Myers-Briggs Company
    https://eu.themyersbriggs.com/en/tools/MBTI/MBTI-Step-II
  40. Myers et al. 1998, p. 119.
  41. Myers et al. 1998, p. 131.
  42. "CAPT Step III"
    https://web.archive.org/web/20080509154636/http://www.capt.org/research/mbti-step3.htm
  43. Jung 1971.
  44. Phillipson, Garry & Case, Peter. The Hidden language of modern Management Science: Astrology, Alchemy and the Myers-Brig
  45. Huber, Kaufmann & Steinmann 2017, p. 34-35.
  46. Myers et al. 1998, p. 1.
  47. Myers & Myers 1995, p. 17.
  48. Genius: The Natural History of Creativity
  49. Carroll 2004.
  50. Jung 1971, p. [page needed].
  51. Myers & Myers 1995, pp. 21–22.
  52. Myers & Myers 1995, p. 9.
  53. Reynierse 2009.
  54. In the Grip: Our Hidden Personality
    https://books.google.com/books?id=k14ft1agW2AC
  55. Myers et al. 1998, p. 3.
  56. The Art of Dialogue: Exploring Personality Differences for More Effective Communication
  57. Energies and Patterns in Psychological type
    https://doi.org/10.4324%2F9781315685946
  58. Myers & Myers 1995, p. 2.
  59. www.themyersbriggs.com
    https://www.themyersbriggs.com/en-US/Products-and-Services/Myers-Briggs
  60. Myers & Myers 1995, p. 84.
  61. www.myersbriggs.org
    https://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/understanding-mbti-type-dynamics/the-dominant-function.htm
  62. Myers & Myers 1995, p. 75.
  63. MBTI manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
  64. Rose Eveleth
    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-myers-briggs-personality-test-is-pretty-much-meaningless-9359770/
  65. Scientific American
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-accurate-are-personality-tests/
  66. Personality and the fate of organizations
    https://search.worldcat.org/oclc/65400436
  67. A History of Western Astrology
  68. Coffield et al. 2004, p. [page needed].
  69. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research
    https://doi.org/10.1037%2F1065-9293.57.3.210
  70. "A Critique of The Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) – Part Two: a Personal Review"
    https://www.recruiter.com/i/a-critique-of-the-myers-briggs-type-indicator-mbti-part-two/
  71. Journal of Counseling & Development
    https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fj.1556-6676.1989.tb02125.x
  72. McCrae & Costa 1989.
  73. Schuwirth 2004.
  74. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
    https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fh0043580
  75. Bess & Harvey 2002.
  76. Nowack 1996.
  77. In the Mind's Eye
    https://doi.org/10.17226%2F1580
  78. Myers et al. 1998, pp. 52–53.
  79. Current Psychology
    https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF02686767
  80. Pastoral Psychology
    https://doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A1022036504232
  81. Myers et al. 1998, p. 53.
  82. "Ethics for Administering the MBTI Instrument"
    https://web.archive.org/web/20090221055018/http://www.myersbriggs.org/myers-and-briggs-foundation/ethical-use-of-the-mbti-instrument/ethics-for-administering.asp
  83. "MBTI Type at Work"
    http://www.myersbriggs.org/type-use-for-everyday-life/mbti-type-at-work/
  84. "Forer effect from the Skeptic's Dictionary"
    http://www.skepdic.com/forer.html
  85. Keirsey 1998, pp. 14–15.
  86. Keirsey 1998, pp. 32–207.
  87. Educational and Psychological Measurement
    https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164485454009
  88. Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach
  89. Statology
    https://www.statology.org/what-is-a-strong-correlation/#:~:text=%20What%20is%20Considered%20to%20Be%20a%20
  90. Genius: The Natural History of Creativity
  91. Fortune Magazine
    http://fortune.com/2013/05/15/have-we-all-been-duped-by-the-myers-briggs-test/
  92. MBTI Applications: A Decade of Research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
  93. Myers et al. 1998, p. 163.
  94. Research in Psychological Type
    https://search.worldcat.org/oclc/12036781
  95. Educational and Psychological Measurement
    https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013164402062004004
  96. European Business Forum
  97. Studies in Art Education
    https://doi.org/10.2307%2F1320192
  98. Studies in Art Education
    https://doi.org/10.2307%2F1319876
  99. Writing on the Edge
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/43158643
  100. Myers & Myers 1995, pp. 40–51.
  101. In the Mind's Eye: Enhancing Human Performance
    https://archive.org/details/inmindseyeenhan00druc
  102. "The Myers-Briggs Company Products"
    https://www.themyersbriggs.com/en-US/Products-and-Services/Popular-Products
  103. "MBTI Form M Manual Supplement"
    https://www.themyersbriggs.com/-/media/Myers-Briggs/Files/Practitioner-Resources/MBTI_FormM_Supplement.pdf?la=en-US
  104. Do what You Are: Discover the Perfect Career for You Through the Secrets of Personality Type
    https://archive.org/details/dowhatyouaredisc00tieg
  105. Wall Street Journal
    https://www.proquest.com/docview/395225147
  106. Myers et al. 1998, p. 78.
  107. Nature
    https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnj7412-545a
  108. "University of Oregon: "Measuring the Big Five Personality Factors""
    https://web.archive.org/web/20100209071733/http://www.uoregon.edu/~sanjay/bigfive.html#b5vffm
  109. Costa, P.T., Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-
  110. Boyle, Stankov & Cattell 1995.
  111. Boyle, G. J. (2008). "Critique of Five-Factor Model (FFM)". In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske. (Eds.), The
  112. Korea JoongAng Daily
    https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2022/04/16/why/korea-mbti-blood-types/20220416070206510.html
  113. Korea JoongAng Daily
    https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2022/03/27/business/industry/mbti-MyersBriggs-MyersBriggs-Type-Indicator/20220327172450438.html
  114. CNN
    https://edition.cnn.com/2022/07/22/asia/south-korea-mbti-personality-test-dating-briggs-myers-intl-hnk-dst/index.html
  115. The Korean Times
    https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2022/09/113_335268.html
  116. #SixthTone
    https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1013421
  117. The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2021/mar/03/they-become-dangerous-tools-the-dark-side-of-personality-tests
  118. BBC News
    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-28315137
Image
Source:
Tip: Wheel or +/− to zoom, drag to pan, Esc to close.