Topzle Topzle

Manchester Ship Canal

Updated: Wikipedia source

Manchester Ship Canal

The Manchester Ship Canal is a 36-mile-long (58 km) inland waterway in the North West of England linking Manchester to the Irish Sea. Starting at the Mersey Estuary at Eastham, near Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, it generally follows the original routes of the rivers Mersey and Irwell through the historic counties of Cheshire and Lancashire before joining the latter at Salford Quays. Several sets of locks lift vessels about 60 ft (18 m) to the canal's terminus in Manchester. Landmarks along its route include the Barton Swing Aqueduct, the world's only swing aqueduct, and Trafford Park, the world's first planned industrial estate and one of the largest in Europe. The rivers Mersey and Irwell were first made navigable in the early 18th century. Goods were also transported on the Runcorn extension of the Bridgewater Canal (from 1776) and the Liverpool and Manchester Railway (from 1830) but by the late 19th century the Mersey and Irwell Navigation had fallen into disrepair and was often unusable. Manchester's business community viewed the charges imposed by Liverpool's docks and the railway companies as excessive. A ship canal was proposed to give ocean-going vessels direct access to Manchester. The region was suffering from the Long Depression; the canal's proponents argued that the scheme would boost competition and create jobs. They gained public support for the scheme, which was first presented to Parliament as a bill in 1882. Faced with stiff opposition from Liverpool, the canal's supporters were unable to gain the necessary act of Parliament to allow the scheme to go ahead until 1885. Construction took six years, beginning in 1887, and cost just over £15 million (equivalent to £2,107,000,000 in 2023). When the ship canal opened in January 1894 (12 years after the first meeting of the Manchester Ship Canal company) it was the largest river navigation canal in the world and enabled the new Port of Manchester to become Britain's third-busiest port despite being about 40 mi (60 km) inland. Changes to shipping methods and the growth of containerisation during the 1970s and 80s meant that many ships were too big to use the canal and traffic declined, resulting in the closure of the terminal docks at Salford. Although able to accommodate vessels from coastal ships to intercontinental cargo liners, the canal was not large enough for most modern vessels. By 2011 traffic had decreased from its peak in 1958 of 18 million long tons (20 million short tons) of freight each year to about 8 million long tons (9.0 million short tons). The canal is now privately owned by Peel Holdings, whose plans include redevelopment, expansion and an increase in shipping from 8,000 containers a year to 100,000 by 2030 as part of their Atlantic Gateway project.

Infobox

Length
36 miles (58 km)
Maximum boat length
600 ft 0 in (182.9 m)(Regularly limited to 530 ft (160 m))
Maximum boat beam
65 ft 6 in (20.0 m)(Regularly limited to 63 ft 6 in (19.35 m))
Locks
5
Status
Open
Navigation authority
Peel Holdings
Current owner
Peel Holdings
Original owner
Manchester Ship Canal Company
Principal engineer
Edward Leader Williams
Date of act
5 August 1885
Construction began
1887
Date of first use
1 January 1894
Date completed
7 December 1893; 132 years ago (1893-12-07)
Start point
Eastham Locks
End point
Salford Quays
Connects to
River Bollin, Glaze Brook, River Mersey, River Irwell, Bridgewater Canal, Shropshire Union Canal, Weaver Navigation
Route map
Route map

Tables

· History › Operational history
1895
1895
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1895
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1905
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1915
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1925
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1935
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1945
1,358,875
1,358,875
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1,358,875
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
3,060,516
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
5,434,046
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
5,881,691
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
6,135,003
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
6,531,963
1955
1955
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1955
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1965
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1975
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1985
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1995
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
2005
18,563,376
18,563,376
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
18,563,376
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
15,715,409
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
14,816,121
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
9,767,380
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
8,751,938
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
7,261,919
Tonnage handled by the Manchester Ship Canal ports
1895
1905
1915
1925
1935
1945
1,358,875
3,060,516
5,434,046
5,881,691
6,135,003
6,531,963
1955
1965
1975
1985
1995
2005
18,563,376
15,715,409
14,816,121
9,767,380
8,751,938
7,261,919

References

  1. £7 million was paid in cash and £3 million invested in a joint venture company set up by Whittaker and the council, Ship
  2. The method of calculation used is the GDP deflator, the ratio of nominal to real gross domestic product multiplied by 10
  3. Comparing relative purchasing power of 3 shillings and 9 pence in 1894 with 2010
  4. All quantities are given in metric tonnes.
  5. A Stoney Sluice gate runs on bearings, reducing the friction caused by the weight of water on the gate.
  6. Chaloner (1990), p. 188
  7. The Manchester Ship Canal
    https://archive.org/details/jstor-1820926
  8. Gray (1997), p. 5
  9. Albert (2007), p. 200
  10. Owen (1983), p. 10
  11. Owen (1983), pp. 3–4
  12. Owen (1983), p. 7
  13. Wheeler (1836), p. 279
  14. Owen (1983), p. 16
  15. Williams et al. (2010), p. 277
  16. Harford (1994), p. 41
  17. Owen (1983), p. 27
  18. Willan (1977), p. 173
  19. Harford (1994), p. 168
  20. Harford (1994), p. 11
  21. Winter (2002), pp. 121–122
  22. Owen (1983), p. 31
  23. Harford (1994), pp. 21–23
  24. Harford (1994), p. 24
  25. Harford (1994), p. 22
  26. Harford (1994), pp. 24–26
  27. Harford (1994), p. 23
  28. Harford (1994), p. 26
  29. Owen (1983), p. 43
  30. Winter (2002), p. 122.
  31. Harford (1994), pp. 26–27
  32. Forwood (1910), p. 108
  33. Bringing the Sea to Manchester—The Need for a 'Big Ditch'
    http://www.canalarchive.org.uk/stories/storycontents.php?enum=te126
  34. Owen (1983), p. 37
  35. Harford (1994), p. 14
  36. Harford (1994), p. 132
  37. Owen (1983), pp. 38–39
  38. Owen (1983), pp. 42–43
  39. Farnie (1980), p. 4
  40. Willan (1977), p. 174
  41. Cumberlidge (2009), p. 184
  42. Willan (1977), p. 175
  43. King (2006), pp. 98–100
  44. King (2006), p. 100
  45. Owen (1983), pp. 46–47
  46. Owen (1983), p. 53
  47. Owen (1983), pp. 61–62
  48. Manchester Ship Canal Opening January 1st 1894, The Norseman Leading from Latchford
    http://www.canalarchive.org.uk/stories/getobjectstory.php?rnum=T2160&enum=TE127&pnum=1&maxp=2
  49. Owen (1983), pp. 59–60
  50. Magazine of the Police Memorabilia Collectors Club
  51. Daily Telegraph
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/only-in-britain/when-did-the-manchester-shipping-canal-open/
  52. The Knights of England
    https://archive.org/stream/knightsofengland02shawuoft/knightsofengland02shawuoft_djvu.txt
  53. Owen (1983), p. 3
  54. measuringworth.com
    https://www.measuringworth.com/ukcompare/
  55. Owen (1983), p. 120
  56. Gray (1997), p. 6
  57. Farnie (1980), p. 3
  58. Owen (1983), p. 89
  59. Gray (1993), p. 34
  60. measuringworth.com
    https://web.archive.org/web/20091124192556/http://www.measuringworth.com/ppoweruk/index.php
  61. Gray (1993), p. 38
  62. Owen (1983), p. 93
  63. industrialpowerhouse.co.uk
    https://archive.today/20120803120022/http://www.industrialpowerhouse.co.uk/site/media/facts-and-figures
  64. salford.gov.uk
    http://www.salford.gov.uk/conbarton.htm
  65. Owen (1983), pp. 117–118
  66. Gray (1997), p. 25
  67. Haws (2000), p. 19
  68. Stoker (1985), p. 55
  69. Haws (2000), p. 43
  70. The Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1976), p. 35
  71. Gray (1993), p. 118
  72. clydeport.co.uk
    https://web.archive.org/web/20110719160804/http://www.clydeport.co.uk/index.php?site_id=6&page_id=380
  73. Kirkwood (2004), p. 83
  74. dft.gov.uk
    http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100513164903/http://www.dft.gov.uk/excel/173025/221412/221658/236005/portstatsq309.xls/
  75. InCom Working Group 16 (1996), p. 12
  76. pancanal.com
    https://web.archive.org/web/20110611094533/http://www.pancanal.com/eng/maritime/notices/n01-05.pdf
  77. ACP
    https://web.archive.org/web/20090506230338/http://www.pancanal.com/common/maritime/advisories/2009/a-02-2009.pdf
  78. Panama canal expansion, reordering maritime trade
    https://www.cma-cgm.com/media/magazine-article/48/panama-canal-expansion-reordering-maritime-trade
  79. Wood (2005), p. 157
  80. salford.gov.uk
    https://web.archive.org/web/20090327122642/http://www.salford.gov.uk/milestones_v2.pdf
  81. Research records (formerly PastScape)
    https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results_Single.aspx?uid=516326&resourceID=19191
  82. peelports.co.uk
    https://web.archive.org/web/20120320071322/http://www.peelports.co.uk/assets/masterplan/Consultation_Draft.pdf
  83. independent.co.uk
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/slow-net-asset-growth-hits-peel-1414017.html
  84. peel.co.uk
    https://web.archive.org/web/20080509071001/http://www.peel.co.uk/peelholdings/history.html
  85. menmedia.co.uk
    https://web.archive.org/web/20110820044131/http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/jobs/s/1422997_peel-ports-to-create-3000-jobs-in-ship-canal-revival
  86. Rennison (1996), p. 264.
  87. Gray (1997), p. 72
  88. Farnie (1980), pp. 132–133
  89. trafford.gov.uk
    https://web.archive.org/web/20120322234645/http://www.trafford.gov.uk/environmentandplanning/strategicplanning/localdevelopmentframework/corestrategyexaminationinpublicdocuments/documents/1045-peel-holdings/Appendix-2-Operational-Protocol-between-MSCC-and-the-EA.pdf
  90. Gray (1997), p. 31
  91. Owen (1983), pp. 80–82
  92. Gray (1997), p. 56
  93. Owen (1983), p. 124
  94. Manchester Evening News
  95. Gray (1997), p. 82
  96. The Monopolies and Mergers Commission (1976), p. 37
  97. Stoker (1985), pp. 57–58
  98. LSE Selected Pamphlets
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/60241154
  99. Nicholls (1996), p. 22
  100. Nicholls (1996), p. 24
  101. Farnie (1980), p. 114
  102. Nicholls (1996), p. 112
  103. Diet for a large planet
  104. Parkinson-Bailey (2000), p. 128
  105. svr.co.uk
    http://www.svr.co.uk/EngineHouse_TheStarsOfTheShow.aspx
  106. Dow (1985), pp. 143, 145.
  107. The Reshaping of British Railways by Dr Richard Beeching, 1963.
  108. National Transport Trust
    https://www.nationaltransporttrust.org.uk/heritage-sites/heritage-detail/manchester-ship-canal-railway---detroit-bridge-salford
  109. Gray (1997), p. 101
  110. Gray (1993), p. 57
  111. middletonrailway.org.uk
    https://web.archive.org/web/20080528203042/http://www.middletonrailway.org.uk/rollingstock/67.htm
  112. The Diesel and Electric Preservation Group
    https://web.archive.org/web/20150617062413/http://www.depg.org/dh162.html
  113. Gray (1997), p. 108
  114. Railways Illustrated
    https://web.archive.org/web/20210710183828/http://media.web.britannica.com/ebsco/pdf/775/44250775.pdf
  115. nwm.org.uk
    http://nwm.org.uk/Explorethemuseum.html
  116. nwm.org.uk
    http://nwm.org.uk/TheIslandWarehouse.html
  117. Owen (1983), pp. 122–123
  118. Trafford Messenger
    https://web.archive.org/web/20180125193749/http://www.messengernewspapers.co.uk/news/9086951.Hulme_Bridge_ferry_back_in_action_in_Davyhulme/
  119. Williams et al. (2010), pp. 278–283
  120. Williams et al. (2010), p. 282
  121. environment-agency.gov.uk
    http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140328084622/http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/static/documents/Leisure/Salmon_behaviour_in_the_Mersey_Catchment_FINAL.pdf
  122. merseybasin.org.uk
    http://www.merseybasin.org.uk/archive/assets/194/original/SourceNW__Issue_9.pdf
  123. halton.gov.uk
    https://www.webcitation.org/61uF37fNo?url=http://www2.halton.gov.uk/pdfs/environment/nature/wiggislandlnr
  124. wrg.co.uk
    https://web.archive.org/web/20120329152158/http://www.wrg.co.uk/page.php?article=755&name=Moore+About+Us
  125. Kindersley (2009), p. 77
  126. Environmental Conservation
    https://web.archive.org/web/20110414100931/http://www.une.edu.au/library/eskillsplus/sample_article.pdf
Image
Source:
Tip: Wheel or +/− to zoom, drag to pan, Esc to close.