Topzle Topzle

Language family

Updated: Wikipedia source

Language family

A language family is a group of languages related through descent from a common ancestor, called the proto-language of that family. The term family is a metaphor borrowed from biology, with the tree model used in historical linguistics analogous to a family tree, or to phylogenetic trees of taxa used in evolutionary taxonomy. Linguists thus describe the daughter languages within a language family as being genetically related. The divergence of a proto-language into daughter languages typically occurs through geographical separation, with different regional dialects of the proto-language undergoing different language changes and thus becoming distinct languages over time. One well-known example of a language family is the Romance languages, including Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, Catalan, Romansh, and many others, all of which are descended from Vulgar Latin. The Romance family itself is part of the larger Indo-European family, which includes many other languages native to Europe and South Asia, all believed to have descended from a common ancestor known as Proto-Indo-European. A language family is usually said to contain at least two languages, although language isolates — languages that are not related to any other language — are occasionally referred to as families that contain one language. Conversely, there is no upper bound to the number of languages a family can contain. Some families, such as the Austronesian languages, contain over 1,000. Language families can be identified from characteristics shared amongst their languages. Sound changes are one of the strongest pieces of evidence that can be used to identify a genetic relationship because of their predictable and consistent nature, and through the comparative method can be used to reconstruct proto-languages. However, languages can also change through language contact, which can falsely suggest genetic relationships. For example, the Mongolic, Tungusic, and Turkic languages share many similarities that have led several scholars to believe they were related. These supposed relationships were later discovered (in the view of most scholars) to be derived through language contact and thus they are not related through shared ancestry. Eventually though, intense language contact with other language families, and inconsistent changes within the original language family, will obscure inherited characteristics and make it virtually impossible to deduce earlier relationships; even the oldest demonstrable language family, Afroasiatic, is far younger than language itself.

Tables

Ethnologue 27
Niger–Congo
Niger–Congo
Family
Niger–Congo
No. oflanguages
1,552
Austronesian
Austronesian
Family
Austronesian
No. oflanguages
1,256
Trans–New Guinea
Trans–New Guinea
Family
Trans–New Guinea
No. oflanguages
481
Sino-Tibetan
Sino-Tibetan
Family
Sino-Tibetan
No. oflanguages
458
Indo-European
Indo-European
Family
Indo-European
No. oflanguages
454
Australian
Australian
Family
Australian
No. oflanguages
384
Afroasiatic
Afroasiatic
Family
Afroasiatic
No. oflanguages
382
Nilo-Saharan
Nilo-Saharan
Family
Nilo-Saharan
No. oflanguages
210
Otomanguean
Otomanguean
Family
Otomanguean
No. oflanguages
179
Austroasiatic
Austroasiatic
Family
Austroasiatic
No. oflanguages
167
Kra-Dai
Kra-Dai
Family
Kra-Dai
No. oflanguages
91
Dravidian
Dravidian
Family
Dravidian
No. oflanguages
85
Family
No. oflanguages
Niger–Congo
1,552
Austronesian
1,256
Trans–New Guinea
481
Sino-Tibetan
458
Indo-European
454
Australian
384
Afroasiatic
382
Nilo-Saharan
210
Otomanguean
179
Austroasiatic
167
Kra-Dai
91
Dravidian
85
Glottolog 5.0
Atlantic–Congo
Atlantic–Congo
Family
Atlantic–Congo
No. oflanguages
1,410
Austronesian
Austronesian
Family
Austronesian
No. oflanguages
1,274
Indo-European
Indo-European
Family
Indo-European
No. oflanguages
586
Sino-Tibetan
Sino-Tibetan
Family
Sino-Tibetan
No. oflanguages
514
Afroasiatic
Afroasiatic
Family
Afroasiatic
No. oflanguages
381
Trans–New Guinea
Trans–New Guinea
Family
Trans–New Guinea
No. oflanguages
316
Pama–Nyungan
Pama–Nyungan
Family
Pama–Nyungan
No. oflanguages
250
Otomanguean
Otomanguean
Family
Otomanguean
No. oflanguages
181
Austroasiatic
Austroasiatic
Family
Austroasiatic
No. oflanguages
158
Tai–Kadai
Tai–Kadai
Family
Tai–Kadai
No. oflanguages
95
Dravidian
Dravidian
Family
Dravidian
No. oflanguages
85
Arawakan
Arawakan
Family
Arawakan
No. oflanguages
77
Family
No. oflanguages
Atlantic–Congo
1,410
Austronesian
1,274
Indo-European
586
Sino-Tibetan
514
Afroasiatic
381
Trans–New Guinea
316
Pama–Nyungan
250
Otomanguean
181
Austroasiatic
158
Tai–Kadai
95
Dravidian
85
Arawakan
77

References

  1. Vernacular Latin, as opposed to the Classical Latin used as a literary language.
  2. A Concise Introduction to Linguistics
    https://books.google.com/books?id=ePQ5CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA340
  3. Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages
    https://books.google.com/books?id=e-PxyCpnnzEC&pg=PA336
  4. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Seventeenth edition. D
    http://www.ethnologue.com
  5. Glottolog 5.0
    https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/aust1307
  6. Diachronica
    https://www.academia.edu/30240029
  7. Science
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7000245
  8. Ethnologue
    https://www.ethnologue.com/guides/how-many-languages
  9. Ethnologue
    https://www.ethnologue.com/guides/largest-families
  10. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo"
    https://doi.org/10.1387%2Fasju.20195
  11. Ethnologue
    https://www.ethnologue.com/browse/families/
  12. glottolog.org
    https://glottolog.org/glottolog/family
  13. ethnologue.com
    https://www.ethnologue.com/subgroup/2/
  14. glottolog.org
    https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/sign1238
  15. Studies in Language
    https://zenodo.org/record/580172
  16. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics
    https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00874726v2
  17. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497766
  18. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC49344
  19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    http://authors.library.caltech.edu/59840/1/17290.full.pdf
  20. Historical Linguistics
  21. Cf. Language families, Glottolog.
    https://glottolog.org/glottolog/family
  22. Nichols, Johanna. Monogenesis or Polygenesis: A Single Ancestral Language for All Humanity? Ch. 58 of The Oxford Handboo
  23. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
    https://doi.org/10.3765%2Fbls.v36i1.3900
  24. Language
    https://books.google.com/books?id=Gfrd-On5iFwC
  25. Edzard, Lutz. Polygenesis, Convergence, and Entropy: An Alternative Model of Linguistic Evolution Applied to Semitic Lin
    https://books.google.com/books?id=UAFVgdGljl4C
  26. Georg, Stefan, Peter A. Michalove, Alexis Manaster Ramer, and Paul J. Sidwell. Telling General Linguists about Altaic. J
  27. Let's Talk about Trees: Genetic relationships of languages and their phylogenic representation
    https://marama.huma-num.fr/data/Kalyan-Francois_2018_Freeing-Comparative-Method-from-Tree-model.pdf
  28. linguisticsociety.org
    https://www.linguisticsociety.org/sites/default/files/e-learning/LSAInstitute--BalkanSprachbundSlides.pdf
  29. BioEssays
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910147
  30. www.linguisticsociety.org
    https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/languages-contact
Image
Source:
Tip: Wheel or +/− to zoom, drag to pan, Esc to close.