Topzle Topzle

1950 United States Senate election in California

Updated: Wikipedia source

1950 United States Senate election in California

The 1950 United States Senate election in California was held on November 7 of that year, following a campaign characterized by accusations and name-calling. Republican Representative and future President Richard Nixon defeated Democrat Representative Helen Gahagan Douglas, after Democratic incumbent Sheridan Downey withdrew during the primary election campaign. Douglas and Nixon each gave up their congressional seats to run against Downey; no other representatives were willing to risk the contest. Both Douglas and Nixon announced their candidacies in late 1949. In March 1950, Downey withdrew from a vicious primary battle with Douglas by announcing his retirement, after which Los Angeles Daily News publisher Manchester Boddy joined the race. Boddy attacked Douglas as a leftist and was the first to compare her to New York Representative Vito Marcantonio, who was accused of being a communist. Boddy, Nixon, and Douglas each entered both party primaries, a practice known as cross-filing. In the Republican primary, Nixon was challenged only by cross-filers and fringe candidates. Nixon won the Republican primary and Douglas the Democratic contest, with each also finishing third in the other party's contest (Boddy finished second in both races). The contentious Democratic race left the party divided, and Democrats were slow to rally to Douglas—some even endorsed Nixon. The Korean War broke out only days after the primaries, and both Nixon and Douglas contended that the other had often voted with Marcantonio to the detriment of national security. Nixon's attacks were far more effective, and he won the November 7 general election by almost 20 percentage points, carrying 53 of California's 58 counties and all metropolitan areas. Though Nixon was later criticized for his tactics in the campaign, he defended his actions, and also stated that Douglas's positions were too far to the left for California voters. Other reasons for the result have been suggested, ranging from tepid support for Douglas from President Harry S. Truman and his administration to the reluctance of voters in 1950 to elect a woman. The campaign gave rise to two political nicknames, both coined by Boddy or making their first appearance in his newspaper: "the Pink Lady" for Douglas and "Tricky Dick" for Nixon.

Infobox

Nominee
Richard Nixon
Party
Republican
Popular vote
2,183,454
Percentage
59.23%

Tables

1950 United States Senate Democratic primary, California, June 6, 1950[c][44] · Primary campaign › Democratic contest › Democratic primary results
Helen Gahagan Douglas
Helen Gahagan Douglas
Candidate
Helen Gahagan Douglas
Candidate
734,842
Votes
46.98
Manchester Boddy
Manchester Boddy
Candidate
Manchester Boddy
Candidate
379,077
Votes
24.23
Richard Nixon
Richard Nixon
Candidate
Richard Nixon
Candidate
318,840
Votes
20.38
Earl D. Desmond
Earl D. Desmond
Candidate
Earl D. Desmond
Candidate
96,752
Votes
6.19
Ulysses Grant Bixby Meyer
Ulysses Grant Bixby Meyer
Candidate
Ulysses Grant Bixby Meyer
Candidate
34,707
Votes
2.22
Total votes
Total votes
Candidate
Total votes
Candidate
1,564,218
Votes
100.00
Candidate
Votes
%
Helen Gahagan Douglas
734,842
46.98
Manchester Boddy
379,077
24.23
Richard Nixon
318,840
20.38
Earl D. Desmond
96,752
6.19
Ulysses Grant Bixby Meyer
34,707
2.22
Total votes
1,564,218
100.00
1950 United States Senate Republican primary, California, June 6, 1950[c][44] · Primary campaign › Republican contest › Republican primary results
Richard Nixon
Richard Nixon
Candidate
Richard Nixon
Candidate
740,465
Votes
64.59
Manchester Boddy
Manchester Boddy
Candidate
Manchester Boddy
Candidate
156,884
Votes
13.68
Helen Gahagan Douglas
Helen Gahagan Douglas
Candidate
Helen Gahagan Douglas
Candidate
153,788
Votes
13.41
Earl D. Desmond
Earl D. Desmond
Candidate
Earl D. Desmond
Candidate
60,613
Votes
5.29
Ulysses Grant Bixby Meyer
Ulysses Grant Bixby Meyer
Candidate
Ulysses Grant Bixby Meyer
Candidate
18,783
Votes
1.64
Albert Levitt
Albert Levitt
Candidate
Albert Levitt
Candidate
15,929
Votes
1.39
Total votes
Total votes
Candidate
Total votes
Candidate
1,146,462
Votes
100.00
Candidate
Votes
%
Richard Nixon
740,465
64.59
Manchester Boddy
156,884
13.68
Helen Gahagan Douglas
153,788
13.41
Earl D. Desmond
60,613
5.29
Ulysses Grant Bixby Meyer
18,783
1.64
Albert Levitt
15,929
1.39
Total votes
1,146,462
100.00
United States Senate election in California, 1950[106][132] · General election results, November 7, 1950
Total votes
Total votes
Party
Total votes
Party
3,686,315
Candidate
100.00
Turnout
Turnout
Party
Turnout
Candidate
73.32
Party
Candidate
Votes
%
Republican
Richard Nixon
2,183,454
59.23
Democratic
Helen Gahagan Douglas
1,502,507
40.76
Write-ins
334
0.01
Total votes
3,686,315
100.00
Turnout
73.32
Republican gain from Democratic
· General election results, November 7, 1950 › Results by county
Mono
Mono
County
Mono
Nixon
76.41%
Votes
664
Douglas
23.59%
Votes
205
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Orange
Orange
County
Orange
Nixon
73.87%
Votes
55,090
Douglas
26.13%
Votes
19,484
Write-ins
0%
Votes
3
Inyo
Inyo
County
Inyo
Nixon
72.81%
Votes
2,702
Douglas
27.19%
Votes
1,009
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Alpine
Alpine
County
Alpine
Nixon
72.09%
Votes
93
Douglas
27.91%
Votes
36
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Imperial
Imperial
County
Imperial
Nixon
72.07%
Votes
8,793
Douglas
27.91%
Votes
3,405
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
1
Del Norte
Del Norte
County
Del Norte
Nixon
70.70%
Votes
2,155
Douglas
29.30%
Votes
893
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
San Benito
San Benito
County
San Benito
Nixon
70.27%
Votes
2,992
Douglas
29.73%
Votes
1,266
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Riverside
Riverside
County
Riverside
Nixon
67.35%
Votes
36,617
Douglas
32.65%
Votes
17,751
Write-ins
0%
Votes
3
Marin
Marin
County
Marin
Nixon
67.27%
Votes
21,400
Douglas
32.73%
Votes
10,411
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
2
Sutter
Sutter
County
Sutter
Nixon
66.63%
Votes
4,993
Douglas
33.37%
Votes
2,501
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Mariposa
Mariposa
County
Mariposa
Nixon
65.16%
Votes
1,496
Douglas
34.84%
Votes
800
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
San Mateo
San Mateo
County
San Mateo
Nixon
65.12%
Votes
57,118
Douglas
34.87%
Votes
30,587
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
8
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
County
Santa Cruz
Nixon
65.10%
Votes
17,431
Douglas
34.90%
Votes
9,343
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Glenn
Glenn
County
Glenn
Nixon
64.87%
Votes
3,416
Douglas
35.11%
Votes
1,849
Write-ins
0.02%
Votes
1
Tulare
Tulare
County
Tulare
Nixon
64.31%
Votes
25,625
Douglas
35.69%
Votes
14,221
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Colusa
Colusa
County
Colusa
Nixon
63.30%
Votes
2,349
Douglas
36.70%
Votes
1,362
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Lake
Lake
County
Lake
Nixon
62.46%
Votes
3,223
Douglas
37.54%
Votes
1,937
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
County
San Luis Obispo
Nixon
62.18%
Votes
11,812
Douglas
37.82%
Votes
7,184
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Sonoma
Sonoma
County
Sonoma
Nixon
61.89%
Votes
23,600
Douglas
38.10%
Votes
14,529
Write-ins
0%
Votes
1
Santa Clara
Santa Clara
County
Santa Clara
Nixon
61.80%
Votes
57,318
Douglas
38.18%
Votes
35,413
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
10
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
County
Santa Barbara
Nixon
61.55%
Votes
20,521
Douglas
38.45%
Votes
12,817
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Stanislaus
Stanislaus
County
Stanislaus
Nixon
61.47%
Votes
22,803
Douglas
38.52%
Votes
14,290
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
2
San Diego
San Diego
County
San Diego
Nixon
61.38%
Votes
115,119
Douglas
38.61%
Votes
72,433
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
11
Humboldt
Humboldt
County
Humboldt
Nixon
61.26%
Votes
14,135
Douglas
38.73%
Votes
8,937
Write-ins
0%
Votes
1
Nevada
Nevada
County
Nevada
Nixon
61.00%
Votes
4,725
Douglas
39.00%
Votes
3,021
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Tuolumne
Tuolumne
County
Tuolumne
Nixon
60.58%
Votes
3,307
Douglas
39.42%
Votes
2,152
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
County
Los Angeles
Nixon
60.33%
Votes
931,803
Douglas
39.66%
Votes
612,510
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
195
Napa
Napa
County
Napa
Nixon
60.23%
Votes
9,449
Douglas
39.77%
Votes
6,239
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
King
King
County
King
Nixon
59.51%
Votes
6,977
Douglas
40.49%
Votes
4,747
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
County
San Bernardino
Nixon
59.48%
Votes
53,956
Douglas
40.51%
Votes
36,751
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
4
Mendocino
Mendocino
County
Mendocino
Nixon
59.00%
Votes
7,197
Douglas
40.99%
Votes
5,000
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
1
Merced
Merced
County
Merced
Nixon
58.85%
Votes
9,922
Douglas
41.14%
Votes
6,937
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
1
Monterey
Monterey
County
Monterey
Nixon
58.66%
Votes
19,506
Douglas
41.32%
Votes
13,741
Write-ins
0.02%
Votes
6
Tehama
Tehama
County
Tehama
Nixon
57.95%
Votes
3,939
Douglas
42.05%
Votes
2,858
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Fresno
Fresno
County
Fresno
Nixon
57.90%
Votes
48,537
Douglas
42.10%
Votes
35,290
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Madera
Madera
County
Madera
Nixon
57.88%
Votes
5,307
Douglas
42.12%
Votes
3,862
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
San Francisco
San Francisco
County
San Francisco
Nixon
57.42%
Votes
165,631
Douglas
42.58%
Votes
122,807
Write-ins
0%
Votes
4
Yuba
Yuba
County
Yuba
Nixon
57.32%
Votes
4,166
Douglas
42.68%
Votes
3,102
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Modoc
Modoc
County
Modoc
Nixon
57.30%
Votes
1,888
Douglas
42.70%
Votes
1,407
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Calaveras
Calaveras
County
Calaveras
Nixon
56.66%
Votes
2,489
Douglas
43.85%
Votes
1,904
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Butte
Butte
County
Butte
Nixon
56.15%
Votes
12,512
Douglas
43.85%
Votes
9,770
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Kern
Kern
County
Kern
Nixon
55.73%
Votes
34,452
Douglas
44.27%
Votes
27,363
Write-ins
0%
Votes
1
Amador
Amador
County
Amador
Nixon
55.71%
Votes
2,059
Douglas
44.29%
Votes
1,637
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Siskiyou
Siskiyou
County
Siskiyou
Nixon
55.32%
Votes
6,774
Douglas
44.68%
Votes
5,472
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Sierra
Sierra
County
Sierra
Nixon
54.94%
Votes
639
Douglas
44.97%
Votes
523
Write-ins
0.09%
Votes
1
San Joaquin
San Joaquin
County
San Joaquin
Nixon
54.87%
Votes
31,046
Douglas
44.99%
Votes
25,459
Write-ins
0.14%
Votes
79
El Dorado
El Dorado
County
El Dorado
Nixon
54.81%
Votes
3,833
Douglas
45.19%
Votes
3,160
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Trinity
Trinity
County
Trinity
Nixon
54.41%
Votes
1,228
Douglas
45.59%
Votes
1,029
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Alameda
Alameda
County
Alameda
Nixon
53.52%
Votes
150,273
Douglas
46.47%
Votes
130,492
Write-ins
0.01%
Votes
15
Ventura
Ventura
County
Ventura
Nixon
52.37%
Votes
16,543
Douglas
47.62%
Votes
15,042
Write-ins
0%
Votes
1
Yolo
Yolo
County
Yolo
Nixon
52.08%
Votes
6,411
Douglas
47.92%
Votes
5,899
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Sacramento
Sacramento
County
Sacramento
Nixon
51.08%
Votes
49,798
Douglas
48.92%
Votes
47,689
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Placer
Placer
County
Placer
Nixon
50.46%
Votes
7,835
Douglas
49.54%
Votes
7,691
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Contra Costa
Contra Costa
County
Contra Costa
Nixon
49.82%
Votes
44,652
Douglas
50.17%
Votes
44,968
Write-ins
0%
Votes
3
Lassen
Lassen
County
Lassen
Nixon
48.11%
Votes
2,556
Douglas
51.89%
Votes
2,757
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Shasta
Shasta
County
Shasta
Nixon
44.90%
Votes
5,841
Douglas
55.10%
Votes
7,156
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Solano
Solano
County
Solano
Nixon
43.89%
Votes
14,385
Douglas
56.11%
Votes
18,389
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
Plumas
Plumas
County
Plumas
Nixon
43.79%
Votes
2,353
Douglas
56.21%
Votes
3,020
Write-ins
0%
Votes
0
County
Nixon
Votes
Douglas
Votes
Write-ins
Votes
Mono
76.41%
664
23.59%
205
0%
0
Orange
73.87%
55,090
26.13%
19,484
0%
3
Inyo
72.81%
2,702
27.19%
1,009
0%
0
Alpine
72.09%
93
27.91%
36
0%
0
Imperial
72.07%
8,793
27.91%
3,405
0.01%
1
Del Norte
70.70%
2,155
29.30%
893
0%
0
San Benito
70.27%
2,992
29.73%
1,266
0%
0
Riverside
67.35%
36,617
32.65%
17,751
0%
3
Marin
67.27%
21,400
32.73%
10,411
0.01%
2
Sutter
66.63%
4,993
33.37%
2,501
0%
0
Mariposa
65.16%
1,496
34.84%
800
0%
0
San Mateo
65.12%
57,118
34.87%
30,587
0.01%
8
Santa Cruz
65.10%
17,431
34.90%
9,343
0%
0
Glenn
64.87%
3,416
35.11%
1,849
0.02%
1
Tulare
64.31%
25,625
35.69%
14,221
0%
0
Colusa
63.30%
2,349
36.70%
1,362
0%
0
Lake
62.46%
3,223
37.54%
1,937
0%
0
San Luis Obispo
62.18%
11,812
37.82%
7,184
0%
0
Sonoma
61.89%
23,600
38.10%
14,529
0%
1
Santa Clara
61.80%
57,318
38.18%
35,413
0.01%
10
Santa Barbara
61.55%
20,521
38.45%
12,817
0%
0
Stanislaus
61.47%
22,803
38.52%
14,290
0.01%
2
San Diego
61.38%
115,119
38.61%
72,433
0.01%
11
Humboldt
61.26%
14,135
38.73%
8,937
0%
1
Nevada
61.00%
4,725
39.00%
3,021
0%
0
Tuolumne
60.58%
3,307
39.42%
2,152
0%
0
Los Angeles
60.33%
931,803
39.66%
612,510
0.01%
195
Napa
60.23%
9,449
39.77%
6,239
0%
0
King
59.51%
6,977
40.49%
4,747
0%
0
San Bernardino
59.48%
53,956
40.51%
36,751
0.01%
4
Mendocino
59.00%
7,197
40.99%
5,000
0.01%
1
Merced
58.85%
9,922
41.14%
6,937
0.01%
1
Monterey
58.66%
19,506
41.32%
13,741
0.02%
6
Tehama
57.95%
3,939
42.05%
2,858
0%
0
Fresno
57.90%
48,537
42.10%
35,290
0%
0
Madera
57.88%
5,307
42.12%
3,862
0%
0
San Francisco
57.42%
165,631
42.58%
122,807
0%
4
Yuba
57.32%
4,166
42.68%
3,102
0%
0
Modoc
57.30%
1,888
42.70%
1,407
0%
0
Calaveras
56.66%
2,489
43.85%
1,904
0%
0
Butte
56.15%
12,512
43.85%
9,770
0%
0
Kern
55.73%
34,452
44.27%
27,363
0%
1
Amador
55.71%
2,059
44.29%
1,637
0%
0
Siskiyou
55.32%
6,774
44.68%
5,472
0%
0
Sierra
54.94%
639
44.97%
523
0.09%
1
San Joaquin
54.87%
31,046
44.99%
25,459
0.14%
79
El Dorado
54.81%
3,833
45.19%
3,160
0%
0
Trinity
54.41%
1,228
45.59%
1,029
0%
0
Alameda
53.52%
150,273
46.47%
130,492
0.01%
15

References

  1. Colloquially called the "Uppie and Downey" ticket.
  2. Denton 2009, p. 144. Note that Denton incorrectly says Boddy (pronounced with a long o) served in World War II, not Worl
  3. 1,911 scattered write-ins combined for both parties not included in totals. Douglas also received 2,326 write-in votes a
  4. Republicans controlled the House for only two of the remaining forty-five years of his life.
  5. By some accounts, the Press Club.
  6. Mitchell 1998, p. 37. Some sources claim that Nixon did not explain that it was Eleanor Butler Roosevelt who sent the co
  7. Morris 1990, p. 581. Chotiner told several variations on this story; this version seems to be the most widespread.
  8. Black 2007, p. 161. That transfer would take place in 1971, while Nixon was president.
  9. Gellman 1999, p. 326. Mitchell places this story in the primary season, and says that Nixon and Douglas were speaking in
  10. Note that most books state that Douglas won only four counties, though Jonathan Bell gets it right.
  11. Black 2007, p. 145.
  12. Scobie 1992, p. 224.
  13. Rosenstone 1970, pp. 291–93.
  14. Rosenstone 1970, p. 302.
  15. Rosenstone 1970, pp. 293–94.
  16. Rosenstone 1970, pp. 298–99.
  17. Bochin 1990, p. 23.
  18. Bochin 1990, p. 3.
  19. Bochin 1990, p. 22.
  20. Ambrose 1988, pp. 197–98.
  21. Morris 1990, p. 516.
  22. Gellman 1999, p. 291.
  23. Black 2007, p. 158.
  24. Gellman 1999, p. 165.
  25. Morris 1990, p. 545.
  26. MeasuringWorth.
  27. Douglas 1982, p. 288.
  28. Gellman 1999, p. 285.
  29. Ambrose 1988, p. 209.
  30. Scobie 1992, p. 232.
  31. Morris 1990, p. 552.
  32. Gellman 1999, p. 292.
  33. Gellman 1999, pp. 296–97.
  34. Morris 1990, p. 553.
  35. Los Angeles Daily News & March 31, 1950.
  36. Wagner 2000, p. 268.
  37. Wagner 2000, p. 267.
  38. Mazo 1959, pp. 76–77.
  39. Gellman 1999, p. 297.
  40. Scobie 1992, p. 237.
  41. Morris 1990, p. 555.
  42. Gellman 1999, p. 299.
  43. Rosenstone 1970, p. 303.
  44. Davies & May 30, 1950.
  45. Gellman 1999, p. 300.
  46. Gellman 1999, p. 310.
  47. Mundt & May 9, 1950.
  48. Gellman 1999, p. 301.
  49. Gellman 1999, p. 302.
  50. Mitchell 1998, p. 35.
  51. Gellman 1999, p. 303.
  52. Los Angeles Daily News & June 5, 1950.
  53. Gellman 1999, p. 304.
  54. Jordan & June 6, 1950, pp. 15–16.
  55. Gellman 1999, p. 282.
  56. Gellman 1999, p. 283.
  57. Gellman 1999, p. 286.
  58. Morris 1990, p. 535.
  59. Gellman 1999, p. 289.
  60. Gellman 1999, pp. 304–05.
  61. Gellman 1999, p. 295.
  62. Ambrose 1988, p. 201.
  63. Ambrose 1988, p. 205.
  64. Gellman 1999, p. 293.
  65. Gellman 1999, p. 298.
  66. Morris 1990, pp. 549–50.
  67. 'Frank Observer' 1950.
  68. Fortnight, "Political Roundup" & May 26, 1950, p. 6.
  69. Morris 1990, pp. 556–57.
  70. People Today & September 12, 1950.
  71. Gellman 1999, p. 309.
  72. Gellman 1999, pp. 306–07.
  73. Ambrose 1988, pp. 210–11.
  74. Ambrose 1988, pp. 213–14.
  75. Morris 1990, p. 571.
  76. Davies & November 1, 1950.
  77. Ambrose 1988, pp. 215–17.
  78. Morris 1990, p. 572.
  79. Gellman 1999, p. 311.
  80. Mitchell 1998, p. 65.
  81. Black 2007, pp. 156–57.
  82. Bonafede & May 30, 1970.
  83. Gellman 1999, p. 313.
  84. Mitchell 1998, p. 130.
  85. Gellman 1999, pp. 320–21.
  86. Gellman 1999, p. 323.
  87. Mitchell 1998, pp. 142–43.
  88. Gellman 1999, p. 308.
  89. Morris 1990, p. 583.
  90. Morris 1990, p. 584.
  91. Gellman 1999, pp. 317–18.
  92. Morris 1990, p. 595.
  93. Morris 1990, p. 596.
  94. Time & September 25, 1950.
  95. Gellman 1999, pp. 321–22.
  96. Mitchell 1998, p. 162.
  97. Time & October 23, 1950.
  98. Morris 1990, p. 597.
  99. Morris 1990, p. 598.
  100. Gellman 1999, p. 318.
  101. Gellman 1999, p. 330.
  102. Gellman 1999, p. 332.
  103. Gellman 1999, p. 333.
  104. Morris 1990, pp. 606–07.
  105. Gellman 1999, p. 331.
  106. Denton 2009, p. 167.
  107. Morris 1990, pp. 601–02.
  108. Douglas 1982, p. 323.
  109. Katcher 1967, p. 260.
  110. Katcher 1967, pp. 256–57.
  111. Katcher 1967, p. 257.
  112. Katcher 1967, p. 261.
  113. Katcher 1967, pp. 261–62.
  114. Scobie 1992, pp. 274–76.
  115. Gellman 1999, p. 335.
  116. Jordan & November 7, 1950, p. 11.
  117. Mitchell 1998, p. 244.
  118. Conklin & November 8, 1950.
  119. Black 2007, p. 165.
  120. Gellman 1999, p. 346.
  121. Morris 1990, p. 614.
  122. Rosenstone 1970, p. 304.
  123. Morris 1990, pp. 618–19.
  124. Mitchell 1998, p. 255.
  125. Mitchell 1998, p. 258.
  126. Mitchell 1998, p. 248.
  127. Gellman 1999, p. 337.
  128. Douglas 1982, pp. 334–35.
  129. Douglas 1982, p. 341.
  130. Mitchell 1998, p. 257.
  131. Morris 1990, p. 617.
  132. Nixon 1978, p. 78.
  133. Gellman 1999, p. 339.
  134. Time & November 13, 1950.
  135. Mazo 1959, p. 71.
  136. Douglas 1982, p. 310.
  137. Scobie 1992, pp. 280–81.
  138. Mazo 1959, p. 80.
  139. Gellman 1999, pp. 340–41.
  140. Black 2007, p. 166.
  141. Scobie 1992, p. 281.
  142. Graf 1951, p. 2.
Image
Source:
Tip: Wheel or +/− to zoom, drag to pan, Esc to close.